On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Joshua Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > As long as we have solidarity of the committers that this is not allowed, > however, this is not a real problem. And it appears that we do. In the > future, it shouldn't even be necessary to discuss it.
Solidarity? Simon - who was a committer last time I checked - seems to think that the current process is entirely bunko. And that is resulting in the waste of a lot of time that could be better spent. Our ability to sustain this development process rests on the idea that we have some kind of shared idea of what is and is not acceptable in general and at particular points in the release cycle. It *shouldn't* be necessary to discuss it, but it apparently is. Over and over and over again, in fact. It is critically important for the future success of this project that we learn to walk and chew gum at the same time. We are failing outright. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
