On 06/06/2011 04:43 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote:
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie jun 03 09:17:08 -0400 2011:
I've now spent enough time working on this issue now to be convinced
that the approach has merit, if we can work out the kinks. I'll start
with some performance numbers.
I hereby recommend that people with patches such as this one while on
the last weeks till release should refrain from posting them until the
release has actually taken place.
%@#!
Next time I'll be sure to only post my patches during beta if they suck.
I think Alvaro's point isn't directed at you Robert but at the idea that
this should be applied to 9.1.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers