On fre, 2011-06-03 at 16:42 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Just to throw out a crazy idea, there has been talk of bug ids. What > if a thread, made up of multiple message ids, was in fact the bug id, > and the first message in the thread (ignoring month boundaries) was > the definitive bug id, but any of the message ids could be used to > represent the definitive one.
That way, if someone breaks a thread, you can't reattach the conversation to a bug. And you couldn't take a thread off a bug or to a new bug. A heavily email-based tracker such as debbugs works almost like that, but for those mentioned reasons, it's simpler to have the messages belonging to a bug stored separately. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
