On mån, 2011-05-30 at 20:16 -0400, Christopher Browne wrote: > My suspicion is that RT may be rather a lot heavier weight in terms of > how it would have to affect process than people would be happy with. > > > What has been pretty clearly expressed is that various of the > developers prefer for the mailing lists and archives thereof to be the > primary data source and the "venue" for bug discussions. > > RT, and Bugzilla, and pretty well the bulk of the issue trackers out > there are designed to themselves be the "venue" for discussions, and > that's not consistent with the preference for email discussions.
> I'd be more optimistic that debbugs, or an adaption thereof, might > more nearly fit into the workflow. Any bug tracker that has an adequate email interface will be isomorphic in terms of how intrusive it is. So I think your argument above is merely a reflection of how people have traditionally used these systems, not how they have to be used. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
