Greg Stark wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > ?The number of people reading and replying to > > emails on pgsql-bugs is already insufficient, perhaps because of the > > (incorrect) perception that Tom does or will fix everything and no one > > else needs to care. ?So anything that makes it harder for people to > > follow along and participate is a non-starter IMV. > > Actually I think most of our bugs don't come in from pgsql-bugs. I > think we want to add other bugs that come up from discussions on > -hackers or -general which for whatever reason don't get immediately > fixed.
Agreed. At that point the TODO list is no longer needed, perhaps. It would be nice to have a system where we could categorize items, and add "features" as well because the bug/feature distinction is often very hard to make. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
