On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Joe Abbate <j...@freedomcircle.com> wrote: > Anyone interested in the tracker, please visit > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/TrackerDiscussion and add your > feedback/input.
I think this illustrates exactly what we *don't* want to happen with a bug tracker. We want the discussion to stay *here* not on some other medium accessible only through the web and editable only through a web interface.... Also your summary seems to have missed the point on the "has email interface" requirement. The table of features you listed has just "Creation of bugs via mail interface" as the only feature that is accessible from email. I'm not sure what Robert meant but I suspect he meant what I would want which is the ability to add comments, close bugs, set other properties, etc. By email. My biggest gripe about bugzilla was that it sent you an email with updates to the bug but you couldn't respond to that email. My ideal bug tracker is the debian one which basically stays out of your way and lets you cc any message to a specific bug at n...@bugs.debian.org which archives that message in the bug and sends it to anyone listening to the bug. And you can have control commands to close it or edit it -- basically making all our existing "that's not a bug bleah bleah" messages into "close nnn; that's not a bug bleah bleah" messages. -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
