On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 19:50, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > You'll notice that this has been a complaint of veteran contributors as > well; WIP patches either get no review, or get reviewed as if they were > expected to be committable.
I don't see this changing anytime in the future. We have a hard enough time getting "finished" patches reviewed. > The person who e-mailed me suggests some form of PostgreSQL Incubator as > a solution. I'm not sure about that, but it does seem to me that we > need somewhere or some way that people can submit patches, ideas, git > forks, etc., for discussion without that discussion needing to > immediately move to the cleanliness/maintainability/supportable status > of the patch. Reminds me a bit of what linux is doing with the "staging" tree. I don't see anyway for that to work with postgres (lower the bar for -contrib?). You can fork fairly easy with github nowdays. For example the replace GEQ with SA is on one of those git sites. Does that mean it gets any attention? *shrug* -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
