On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> Specifically, if we're not going to remove write location, then I >> think we need to apply something like the attached. > >> while (walrcv_receive(0, &type, &buf, &len)) >> XLogWalRcvProcessMsg(type, buf, len); > >> + /* Let the master know that we received some data. */ >> + XLogWalRcvSendReply(); > > What if we didn't actually receive any new data?
The portion of the code immediately preceding what's included in the diff guards against that, and there is a second guard in XLogWalRcvSendReply(). -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
