On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 15:20, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 10:58:15AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > > On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 10:51, Lamar Owen wrote: > > > > > What isn't funny is Oliver Elphick's results on Debian, running glibc 2.2.5 > > > (same as Red Hat 7.3's version). > > > > This is a completely different version. Once Debian updates (in a few > > years) they'll get the same result. > > Ulrich, how shall I understand this? I'm pretty sure Oliver > does not use a Debian 2.2 system with glibc-2.1.3 but a pretty > up-to-date one. The glibc version in the soon to be released Woody > release is 2.2.5.
In fact, I run "unstable" and the version is 2.2.5-6. I couldn't see any reference in the Debian changelog, but I'm wondering if the change was commented out. I haven't had the time to download the source and go looking. -- Oliver Elphick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C "I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made..." Psalms 139:14
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
