On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 10:58:15AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 10:51, Lamar Owen wrote: > > > What isn't funny is Oliver Elphick's results on Debian, running glibc 2.2.5 > > (same as Red Hat 7.3's version). > > This is a completely different version. Once Debian updates (in a few > years) they'll get the same result.
Ulrich, how shall I understand this? I'm pretty sure Oliver does not use a Debian 2.2 system with glibc-2.1.3 but a pretty up-to-date one. The glibc version in the soon to be released Woody release is 2.2.5. This seems to be the very same version that RedHat uses. So what could/should Debian update? Besides, the "in a few years" comment looks like FUD to me. It may be a few years since we talked the last time, but I cannot imagine you changed that much that you spread FUD nowadays. So I probably misunderstood this sentence, but nevertheless would like to know what Debian should update. Or do you mean that once Debian updates to glibc 2.3 (or whatever the next release will be) it will show the same results? Does RedHat 7.3 already run on that new release? But then I would think they changed the version number. Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
