Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> 2011/2/17 Oleg Bartunov <o...@sai.msu.su>:
>> We need to fix inet support as Tom complained and then will commit.
> I think those are two separate issues.
Yeah ... also, fixing the inet problem looked to me like it'd probably
be a major compatibility break (change in on-disk index contents).
Not something to rush into at the end of a development cycle.
In any case, I was pointing to that as a reason that btree_gist wasn't
ready to be in core. It has nothing to do with KNN-ifying the module.
I would like to see that happen before 9.1, else KNN will go out with
not very many actual use-cases supported.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
