Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Oleg Bartunov <o...@sai.msu.su> wrote: > > Aha, > > > > Teodor sent it to the list Dec 28, see > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4D1A1677.80300%40sigaev.ru > > > > After a month I didn't see any activity on this patch, so I I added it to > > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=350 Jan 21 > > > > Now, I realised it was too late. Added to current commitfest. > > I think this patch missed the deadline for the current CommitFest. > It's true that it was posted to the list in time, but it's just > madness to think we can do review in a meaningful way and get done in > a reasonable time if every patch that's ever been posted is fair game > to be added to the CommitFest at any point. I believe it's a > generally accepted principle that adding things to the CommitFest > properly is the submitter's responsibility. > > That having been said, this looks like a fairly mechanical change to a > contrib module that you and Teodor wrote. So I'd say if you guys are > confident that it's correct, go ahead and commit. If you need it > reviewed, or if you can't commit it in the next week or so, I think > it's going to have to wait for 9.2.
If you need a +1, agreed. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
