On Feb 14, 2011, at 8:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> >> Yes, but the truth is that the extension name, at least, is known from the >> control file. > > Yeah, I think it's true in the current code base that we always know the > extension name we are interested in. However, that's no protection if > we allow extensions to contain the separator substring. Consider > foo--bar--baz.sql > Is this an update script for foo (from version bar to version baz), > or is it an install script for some other extension named foo--bar? > > Also, I think it'd be better if we didn't assume that we will always > know the extension name when trying to make sense of a script name. > That's the sort of assumption that will bite you on the rear eventually.
Works for me. Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
