On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Jan Urbański <wulc...@wulczer.org> wrote: > On 11/02/11 16:43, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Jan Urbański <wulc...@wulczer.org> wrote: >>>> That's it for now. It is an exciting feature and plpython will be the >>>> first language to think of when you're building "object database" if >>>> this feature is in. The design here will affect following pl/perl and >>>> other so it is important enough to discuss. >>> >>> Yes, I ended up writing this patch as a PoC of how you can integrate >>> procedural languages with arbitrary addon modules, so it would be good >>> to have a discussion about the general mechanisms. I'm aware that this >>> discussion, and subsequently this patch, might be punted to 9.2 >>> (although that would be a shame). >> >> It's not clear to me from this discussion whether this patch (a) now >> works and has consensus, and should be committed, (b) still needs more >> discussion, but hopes to make it into 9.1, or (c) is now 9.2 material. > > I believe it's (b). But as we don't have time for that discussion that > late in the release cycle, I think we need to consider it identical to (c).
OK, I'll mark it Returned with Feedback. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
