On 11/02/11 16:43, Robert Haas wrote: > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Jan Urbański <wulc...@wulczer.org> wrote: >>> That's it for now. It is an exciting feature and plpython will be the >>> first language to think of when you're building "object database" if >>> this feature is in. The design here will affect following pl/perl and >>> other so it is important enough to discuss. >> >> Yes, I ended up writing this patch as a PoC of how you can integrate >> procedural languages with arbitrary addon modules, so it would be good >> to have a discussion about the general mechanisms. I'm aware that this >> discussion, and subsequently this patch, might be punted to 9.2 >> (although that would be a shame). > > It's not clear to me from this discussion whether this patch (a) now > works and has consensus, and should be committed, (b) still needs more > discussion, but hopes to make it into 9.1, or (c) is now 9.2 material.
I believe it's (b). But as we don't have time for that discussion that late in the release cycle, I think we need to consider it identical to (c). Cheers, Jan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
