On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 19:23, mlw wrote: > Lee Kindness wrote: > > > > > Sure It'd be nice to have a native PostgreSQL on XP Server (I don't > > see the point in consumer level Microsoft OSs) but how high is the > > demand? What's the prize? What are the current limitations - fork, > > semaphores, ugly interface...? > > The demand for PostgreSQL on Windows is currently as near to zero as you can > imagine. This is probably because there is no viable PostgreSQL on Windows. > > If written correctly, a Win32 version of PostgreSQL would rock the Windows > world. I see no reason why it would be limted to the "professional" version. > Hell, it could even run on Windows 98.
Perhaps we could simpultaneously solve another problem - creating a singlethreaded embeddable version of postgresql "engine" ------------- Hannu ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
