Christopher Browne wrote: > > If "fixing" PostgreSQL to "work" on Win32 caused a whole lot of > breakage on the Unix side, that would _not_ be a "win." It might > do well on Win32, but breakage could lead to a LOSS of interest > on Unix, as people decided to take the point of view that the > developers considered it more important to toady to Win-Needs > than to improve how it works on Unix. As a PostgreSQL user, I *wholeheartedly* agree. I have no need nor interest in a Win32 solution. Period. If I perceive that an effort to add a Win32 postgresql is adversely impacting the ongoing development of Unix-based PostgreSQL then I will start looking at other solutions.
In fact, if you folks could find additional resources that would support Win32 development, it still seems to me that perhaps those resources could be better spent improving the Unix version. -- Steve Wampler -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] O sibile, si ergo. Fortibus es enaro. Nobile, demis trux. Demis phulla causan dux. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
