Josh Berkus <j...@postgresql.org> writes: > So, again, I don't agree that a separate synchrep permission is useful, > or warranted.
+1 > However, your arguments *do* make me backpedal on the issue of having a > list of synch rep roles on the master. I can easily imagine a DBA > needing to rapidly disable synch rep if replication is failing, without > taking the time to log in to several separate standbys, one or more of > which might be improperly configured and inaccessible. I can't think of > a simpler way to do that than having a synch_rep_roles configuration on > the master. That would also handle control issues for the senior DBA, > since you'd need superuser access to the master to modify it. What about the HBA here? Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
