Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: > Yes, especially since we discussed it in Stuttgart. I guess it may > have been during the party...
I remember we talked about it, I didn't remember a patch had reached the list… > Yes, if it should go in any of the current binaries, initdb would be > the reasonable place, not pg_ctl ;) Well, pg_ctl is able to call initdb for users, but yes. > That said, if we're going to wrap pg_streamrecv into 9.1 (which I > think we should), then *that* is where it should go. They should at least cooperate so that you don't need to setup WAL archiving explicitly while preparing the standby, if at least possible. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
