On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote: >> What's weird about using the role name? That's our standard way of >> distinguishing between two or more users. Why invent something new? > > wel a user is not a host/server for me - given there is no real benefit from > using distinct roles for each standby yet I don't see why we should > complicate the replication setup procedure by requiring 1 role per standby. > So I'm all for giving each standby a name but please make it an explicit one > and not something that is only vaguely related to the actual standby host.
OK. If that's the consensus, can someone post a patch? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
