On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On 31.12.2010 14:40, Robert Haas wrote: >> >> Someone may have proposed this before, but one way of getting standby >> naming "for free" would be to make the standby names the same as the >> roles used to log in, rather than adding a separate parameter. We >> could just recommend to people that they use a separate, descriptive >> role name for each standby. Then the synchronous_standbys parameter - >> when added - would mean "a standby from one of these roles". > > Seems a bit weird. It's not a lot of effort to give each standby a name. But > if you want something automatic, how about gethostname() ?
Uh, wow, no way. That would be making a critical aspect of system reliability depend on something way, way outside of our configuration. What's weird about using the role name? That's our standard way of distinguishing between two or more users. Why invent something new? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
