On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Kevin Grittner <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> it would be annoying to have to checkpoint after a data load > > Heck, in my world it's currently pretty much a necessity to run > VACUUM FREEZE ANALYZE on a table after a data load before it's > reasonable to expose the table to production use. It would hardly > be an inconvenience to also run a CHECKPOINT.
The goal here is to make that better, not worse! -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers