On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Kevin Grittner
<kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>> it would be annoying to have to checkpoint after a data load
>
> Heck, in my world it's currently pretty much a necessity to run
> VACUUM FREEZE ANALYZE on a table after a data load before it's
> reasonable to expose the table to production use.  It would hardly
> be an inconvenience to also run a CHECKPOINT.

The goal here is to make that better, not worse!

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to