On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> But having said that, I wonder whether we need a full-page image for >> a WAL-logged action that is known to involve only setting a single bit >> and updating LSN. Would omitting the FPI be any more risky than what >> happens now (ie, the page does get written back to disk at some point, >> without any image from which it can be rewritten if the write fails...) > > That's pretty much exactly what Heikki proposed 35 minutes ago, and > you objected 6 minutes later. I still think it might work.
Oh, I see the difference now. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
