Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> PQping is supposed to be smarter about classifying errors >> than this.
> I was not aware this was discussed last week because I am behind on > email. I was fixing a report from a month ago. I did explain how I was > doing the tests. Um, you did respond in that thread, several times even: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-11/msg01102.php so I kind of assumed that the patch you presented this week did what was agreed to last week. I have committed a patch to make PQping do what was agreed to. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
