Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> Fujii Masao wrote:
>> I agree to treat the receipt of password request from the server as success
>> of the server starting. But I don't think that we should treat other
>> rejection
>> cases that way and change the existing behavior.
> OK, that is easy to fix.
It's wrong though. If you get back a "password rejected" error, or most
other types of errors, it still indicates that the server started.
We just went over this a few days ago.
> The only downside is that if you misconfigured
> .pgpass (which is what I used for testing), you have to wait 60 seconds
> to get the "cannot connect" error message. Is that OK?
No; it's useless and unnecessary behavior.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
