Bernd Helmle <maili...@oopsware.de> writes: > This reminds me of a small discussion we had some years ago when i targeted > this for the sake of completeness of ASS (see > <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-06/msg00021.php>).
Discovered it, thanks for the pointer. > I didn't follow the previous discussions about EXTENSION very closely, but > to amend the idea made in the mentioned thread, couldn't we just invent a > facility to move classes of objects belonging to an extension, only? Well under the hood you still need about the same code. In the current patch version I have, that would mean forgetting about a ~20 lines long function and keeping the other two, 10+30 lines about. Now if someone has a idea on how to have a single routine that knows how to deal with any object type and change its namespace, I'm all ears, and willing to have a try at it. Coding in C is for me a twice a year exercise, so whatever I come up with will be... improvable, I fear. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
