On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:18:25AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:03:55AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Dmitriy Igrishin <dmit...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > I've asked pgsql-general. > >> > Unfortunately it seems that there is no better way to do it except > >> > parsing PQerrorMessage(). Sadly. > >> > >> Yeah, doesn't look like it. A quick glance at the code reveals that a > >> PGresult can store individual error fields but a PGconn can store only > >> a message. :-( > > > > Does this seem worth patching for 9.1? > > Please feel free to submit a patch if you have an idea how to solve it.
Will look that over this evening and submit an idea for a patch :) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
