On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:03:55AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Dmitriy Igrishin <dmit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I've asked pgsql-general.
>> > Unfortunately it seems that there is no better way to do it except
>> > parsing PQerrorMessage(). Sadly.
>>
>> Yeah, doesn't look like it.  A quick glance at the code reveals that a
>> PGresult can store individual error fields but a PGconn can store only
>> a message.   :-(
>
> Does this seem worth patching for 9.1?

Please feel free to submit a patch if you have an idea how to solve it.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to