On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:03:55AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Dmitriy Igrishin <dmit...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I've asked pgsql-general. >> > Unfortunately it seems that there is no better way to do it except >> > parsing PQerrorMessage(). Sadly. >> >> Yeah, doesn't look like it. A quick glance at the code reveals that a >> PGresult can store individual error fields but a PGconn can store only >> a message. :-( > > Does this seem worth patching for 9.1?
Please feel free to submit a patch if you have an idea how to solve it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers