On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> Proposed doc patch attached. > > Looks accurate to me. I like the additional linking to the Reliability page > you put in there too. Heavily referencing that important page from related > areas is a good thing, particularly now that it's got a lot more details > than it used to.
Cool, thanks for the fast review. I suspect there are more details that could stand to be added to the WAL reliability page as well, but I don't know what they are so I can't add them. I still have the feeling that we have not put quite a large enough red, blinking light around this issue, but I don't have a concrete suggestion. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
