On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 01:53:45PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > Excerpts from David E. Wheeler's message of lun sep 27 12:25:31 -0400 2010: > >> On Sep 27, 2010, at 5:05 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> > >> > Um, no. > >> > > >> > In the meantime, I have arrived at the conclusion that doing this isn't > >> > worth it because it will break all regression test output. We can fix > >> > the stuff in our tree, but pg_regress is also used externally, and those > >> > guys would have a nightmare with this change. Perhaps if there is > >> > another more significant revision of the table style in the future, we > >> > should keep this issue in mind. > >> > >> Or change the way pg_regress works. > > > > Perhaps using unaligned mode? The problem with that is that it becomes > > very difficult to review changes to expected output. > > Uh, yuck! If we don't care about changing the expected output, we can > just trim the whitespace as Peter suggested originally.
I must be missing something pretty crucial here as far as the complexity of changing all the regression tests. Wouldn't trimming all trailing whitespace do the trick? Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
