On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 18:28, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >>>> Magnus posted an updated conversion this morning. >>> >>>> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql-migration.git;a=summary >>> >>>> Evidently, however, he didn't do the same things you did, because >>>> there are DEFINITELY more than 9 manufactured commits in this one. >>> >>> Um ... I just did >>> git clone git://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql-migration.git >>> and I only see nine. It's got some *other* problems though; compared >>> to a conversion I just finished locally, it's missing a whole lot of >>> history for some of the old jdbc files. >>> >>> Is there any possibility that "git clone" isn't very trustworthy? >>> It's a bit scary that we don't see identical views of this repository. >> >> *scratches head* >> >> I did a git-fetch into an existing copy of the old contents of that >> repository, rather than a fresh clone. Let me nuke it and start over. > > OK, the fresh clone does in fact show just 9 manufactured commits. > Sorry, I must not have cleaned out the old state properly.
Turns out I did th esame thing from my box to the repo on git.postgresql.org. So I've now wiped that repository and re-pushed mine. Can you give it another check? (from a fresh clone) -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
