On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >>> Magnus posted an updated conversion this morning. >> >>> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql-migration.git;a=summary >> >>> Evidently, however, he didn't do the same things you did, because >>> there are DEFINITELY more than 9 manufactured commits in this one. >> >> Um ... I just did >> git clone git://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql-migration.git >> and I only see nine. It's got some *other* problems though; compared >> to a conversion I just finished locally, it's missing a whole lot of >> history for some of the old jdbc files. >> >> Is there any possibility that "git clone" isn't very trustworthy? >> It's a bit scary that we don't see identical views of this repository. > > *scratches head* > > I did a git-fetch into an existing copy of the old contents of that > repository, rather than a fresh clone. Let me nuke it and start over.
OK, the fresh clone does in fact show just 9 manufactured commits. Sorry, I must not have cleaned out the old state properly. What's the problem with the old JDBC files? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
