On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Hitoshi Harada <umi.tan...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/9/16 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>: >> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Yet there are other cases that probably *could* work well based on a >>> storage-level abstraction boundary; index-organized tables for instance. >>> So I think we need to have some realistic idea of what we want to >>> support and design an API accordingly, not hope that if we don't >>> know what we want we will somehow manage to pick an API that makes >>> all things possible. >> >> Agreed. Random ideas: index-organized tables... > > I'd love to see a table that is based on one of the existing KVSs.
I'm not familiar with the term KVS? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
