2010/9/16 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Yet there are other cases that probably *could* work well based on a >> storage-level abstraction boundary; index-organized tables for instance. >> So I think we need to have some realistic idea of what we want to >> support and design an API accordingly, not hope that if we don't >> know what we want we will somehow manage to pick an API that makes >> all things possible. > > Agreed. Random ideas: index-organized tables...
I'd love to see a table that is based on one of the existing KVSs. -- Hitoshi Harada -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
