On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Mike Fowler <m...@mlfowler.com> writes: >> Turns out the bug was filed in 2005 (see >> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307061). They are currently >> taking a fairly loose interpretation of the XSLT spec. However that was >> only one aspect of the concern. The other was that no errors were being >> reported back in psql when the libxslt is generating errors. Is this >> desirable? > > Uh, no; if we're failing to detect an error that the library does > report, that's our bug (and another indication of the immaturity > of this code :-()).
Right. So, what about Mike's idea of extracting this into a new contrib module, perhaps contrib/xslt? That might also provide a good excuse to jettison any details of the existing interfaces that we happen to find unfortunate. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
