2010/8/6 David Fetter <da...@fetter.org>:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 05:57:37AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> 2010/8/6 Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net>:
>> > On 08/05/2010 06:56 PM, Mike Fowler wrote:
>> >> SELECT
>> >> xslt_process('<employee><name>cim</name><age>30</age><pay>400</pay></employee>'::text,
>> >> $$<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";
>> >> version="1.0">
>> >> <xsl:output method="xml" omit-xml-declaration="yes" indent="yes"/>
>> >>
>> > [snip]
>> >>
>> >> </xsl:stylesheet>$$::text, 'n1=v1,n2=v2,n3=v3,n4=v4,n5=v5'::text)
>> >
>> > I haven't been paying attention to this, so sorry if this has been
>> > discussed
>> > before, but it just caught my eye. Why are we passing these params as a
>> > comma-separated list rather than as an array or as a variadic list of
>> > params? This looks rather ugly. What if you want to have a param that
>> > includes a comma?
>>
>> There is probably problem in pairs - label = value. Can be nice, if we
>> can use a variadic functions for this, but I am afraid, ...
>>
>> using a variadic function isn't too much nice now
>>
>> some xslt_process(xmlsrc, 'n1=v1','n2=v2','n3=v3'
>
> This sounds like the perfect case for pulling hstore into core code. :)
I afraid so integration of hstore can break and block work on real
hash support. I would to have hash tables in core, but with usual
features and usual syntax - like Perl or PHP
Regards
Pavel
>
> Cheers,
> David.
> --
> David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
> Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
> Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com
> iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
>
> Remember to vote!
> Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
