> I think, yes, it does make sense. Because we are talking > about porting a whole lot of COBOL applications.
COBOL??? > The ESQL/C or ECPG connector was already written > the Informix quirks in mind, so it fetches only one record > at a time passing it to the application. And similar performance > is expected from ECPG - which excpectation is not fulfilled > currently because libecpg doesn't do the same caching as > ESQL/C does. Eh, you are talking about a program you wrote for your customer or they wrote themselves, right? I simply refuse to add this stuff only to fix this situation for that one customer of yours if it only hits them. Now the thing to discuss is how common is this situation. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org ICQ 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype michaelmeskes, Jabber mes...@jabber.org VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
