Hiroshi Inoue wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tom Lane > > > > Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Could we get out of this by defining that "timeout" is > > > automatically reset at next statement end? > > > > I was hoping to avoid that, because it seems like a wart. OTOH, > > it'd be less of a wart than the global changes of semantics that > > Bruce is proposing :-( > > Probably I'm misunderstanding this thread. > Why must the query_timeout be reset particularly ? > What's wrong with simply issueing set query_timeout > command just before every query ?
You could do that, but we also imagine cases where people would want to set a timeout for each query in an entire session. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
