> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane > > Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Could we get out of this by defining that "timeout" is > > automatically reset at next statement end? > > I was hoping to avoid that, because it seems like a wart. OTOH, > it'd be less of a wart than the global changes of semantics that > Bruce is proposing :-(
Probably I'm misunderstanding this thread. Why must the query_timeout be reset particularly ? What's wrong with simply issueing set query_timeout command just before every query ? regards, Hiroshi Inoue ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
