Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Cédric Villemain wrote:
>> 2010/4/30 Stefan Kaltenbrunner <ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc>:
>>> I don't think the git repo was ever considered working for the backbranches
>>> at all...
>>
>> Really ?!
>> Then we have to remove the backbranches from the git.
>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Working_with_Git#Using_Back_Branches
> Yeah, or fix them.
This thread isn't exactly leaving me with a warm fuzzy feeling about
moving the master repository to git. *Why* is the mirror broken, and
what assurances do we have that the problem won't recur in the proposed
transition?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
