Cédric Villemain wrote: > 2010/4/30 Stefan Kaltenbrunner <ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc>: >> I don't think the git repo was ever considered working for the backbranches >> at all... > > Really ?! > Then we have to remove the backbranches from the git. > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Working_with_Git#Using_Back_Branches
Yeah, or fix them. FWIW, REL8_4_STABLE and REL8_3_STABLE are working, I just compared them against CVS checkouts. REL8_2_STABLE is not, it's missing a security-related patch from December. I didn't check the other branches. I have nothing against dropping the older branches, but please keep at least REL8_4_STABLE, I use it frequently. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
