On 2010-01-07 00:08 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On ons, 2010-01-06 at 15:52 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
"David E. Wheeler"<da...@kineticode.com>  wrote:

Last I heard, Andrew was willing to require Test::More for
testing, so that a Perl script could handle multiple psql
connections (perhaps forked) and output test results based on
them. But he wasn't as interested in requiring DBI and DBD::Pg,
neither of which are in the Perl core and are more of a PITA to
install (not huge, but the barrier might as well stay low).

OK, I've gotten familiar with Perl as a programming language and
tinkered with Test::More.  What's not clear to me yet is what would
be considered good technique for launching several psql sessions
from that environment, interleaving commands to each of them, and
checking results from each of them as the test plan progresses.  Any
code snippets or URLs to help me understand that are welcome.  (It
seems clear enough with DBI, but I'm trying to avoid that per the
above.)

Then I don't see much of a point in using Perl.  You might as well fire
up a few psqls from a shell script.

I don't see how that would work, but I might have misunderstood what we're reaching for here. What I think would be most useful would be to interleave statements between transactions, not just randomly fire psql sessions and hope for race conditions.


Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to