Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: > I'm not sure how portable is the LONG_BIT business.
I think checking SIZEOF_LONG would be preferred, since that's what
we use elsewhere. Although actually I wonder why this code exists
at all --- wouldn't it be easier to make these depend on "int64"?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
