Hannu Krosing <ha...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 07:58 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Thanks. Looks like good input. With the further clarification that we
>> use NOTIFY it seems a solution is forming.
> If we use notify, then "the sufficiently smart client" (tm) should
> probably declared that it is waiting for such notify , no ?
We are using NOTICE, not NOTIFY, assuming that we use anything at all
(which I still regard as unnecessary). Please stop injecting confusion
into the discussion.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
