KaiGai Kohei wrote:. > Needless to say, NEC is also a supporter to develop and maintain > SE-PgSQL feature. We believe it is a necessity feature to construct > secure platform for SaaS/Cloud computing, so my corporation has funded > to develop SE-PgSQL for more than two years. > > As I noted before, if you worried about I escape anyware, it is quite > incorrect. Now I've been working to develop and integrate SE-PgSQL in > full-time. > > We can also say SELinux community provides a development resource to > other OSS communities. For example, the recent version of Xorg has > SELinux support in userspace, such as SE-PgSQL, by the developer who > originally worked in SELinux community. SE-PgSQL is a similar case. > Anyway, I don't think we should build barrier between communities. > > >
I think you have been remarkably good about our caution in accepting this. You certainly have my admiration for your patience. What would probably help us a lot would be to know some names of large users who want and will support this. NEC's name is a good start, but if a few other enterprise users spoke up it would help to make the decision a lot easier. My own experience with SE-Linux has been fairly unfortunate - I have tripped over it too many times and years ago adopted a practice of turning it off whenever I could. I suspect many people have similar war stories, and there will thus probably be quite some resistance to a feature I accept could well be of significant use to some classes of users. cheers andrew -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
