Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 14:46 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> "Joshua D. Drake" <j...@commandprompt.com> writes: >>> On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 20:28 -0800, David Fetter wrote: >>>> This is totally separate from the really important question of whether >>>> SE-Linux has a future, and another about whether, if SE-Linux has a >>>> future, PostgreSQL needs to go there. >>> Why would we think that it doesn't? >> Have you noticed anyone except Red Hat taking it seriously? > > I just did a little research and it appears the other two big names in > this world (Novel and Ubuntu) are using something called App Armor.
As far as I can see, SUSE, Ubuntu and Debian provide SELinux option. But they are more conservative than RedHat/Fedora, because it is not enabled in the default installation. I don't think it is unpreferable decision. Users can choose the option by themself according to requirements in the system. Thanks, -- OSS Platform Development Division, NEC KaiGai Kohei <kai...@ak.jp.nec.com> -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
