On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 14:36 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I guess my point wasn't that the message was likely to be exercised,
> but rather that it isn't obvious that it's describing an error
> condition at all. If you get this message:
>
> relation "whatever" has relopxconstraints = -3
>
I pretty much copied similar code for relchecks, see
pg_constraint.c:570.
If you have a suggestion, I'll make the change. It doesn't sound too
urgent though, to me.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
