Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
Emmanuel Cecchet wrote:
If you prefer to postpone the auto-partitioning to the next commit
fest, I can strip it from the current patch and re-submit it for the
next fest (but it's just 2 isolated methods really easy to review).
I certainly think this should be separated out. In general it is not a
good idea to roll distinct features together. It complicates both the
reviewing process and the discussion.
I think though that Greg was suggesting that we need some more thought
about the overall road map. Agglomerating "independent" features onto
COPY one at a time is going to lead to a mess, unless they fit into an
overall design plan.
I don't disagree with that. But even if we get a roadmap of some set of
features we want to implement, rolling them all together isn't a good
way to go.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
