Tom Lane wrote: > > I intentionally avoided hstore_to_array because it would be unclear > > which one it meant (the 1-d or 2-d result). > > hstore_to_list seems like a pretty horrible name though for something > that produces an array. I also note that "array" means "1-D array" > according to no less an authority than the SQL standard ;-). I think > we could live with hstore_to_array and hstore_to_matrix. Thoughts, > other ideas?
Off topic, but in normal English usage I thought 'vector' was a 1-D array, and an array could be any number of dimensions. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
