On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Jaime Casanova <jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec> wrote: > have anyone better ideas about the name? if not, then go with > pg_largeobject_meta
I don't think there's anything wrong with calling it metadata. That seems to leave the door open to future things we might want to do, without restricting it to security-related settings or whatever. But I don't see any reason to abbreviate it either - I'd go with pg_largeobject_metadata rather than just pg_largeobject_meta. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
